Does that make a difference? I guess it probably does. Does that make a difference to you? I've seen people on the lot using Stanley hammers. TVPaint Animation is described as 'TVP Animation is the leading paperless drawing and animation tool, able to imitate traditional techniques such as Pen Brush, Gouache, Watercolour, Pencil, Felt-tip and Airbrush, and animate them over frames' and is a Animation Maker in the Photos & Graphics category. There are lots of bottle necks to work around. I'm pretty sure that rendered effects still can't take advantage of a render farm. A big production with it (feature film, with lots of animators) would require a pile of processing power, and a lot of storage space. Often times, I can see that something can be done, but there's a point of "why bother"? If Disney is going to use TV Paint (or anything else), I would think they'd just make a deal with the developers to make it do what they needed it to. Then someone would have to develop it and implement it. I'm sure it would require additional software (there was already a discussion about this a while ago). TVPaint Animation is described as TVP Animation is the leading paperless drawing and animation tool, able to imitate traditional techniques such as Pen Brush, Gouache, Watercolour, Pencil, Felt-tip and Airbrush, and animate them over frames and is a Animation Maker in the Photos & Graphics category. I wonder if it, or ASP scripting is robust enough to deal with all of the management issues though.
0 kommentar(er)
